Perhaps I should make this crystal clear: When they say 4:1 they are *not* saying a COP of 4 or 5 or whatever. They are saying *a COP of 0.25!*
I cannot emphasize enough how important it is, in this sensitive situation, to avoid a mistake such as that made by Charles Fancis in his erroneous report. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:04 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's not what the article says: > > http://it.ibtimes.com/articles/53211/20130722/fusione-fredda-defkalion-video-streaming-presentazione.htm > > It says a 4:1 ratio: > > Luke Gamberale, after specifying that were observed radiation but in very > low quantities, reminiscent of the famous report of ENEA, the ratio 41. In > the final results of this experiment "you could see a clear correlation > between small excesses of measurable heat and helium production" which was > measured by a mass spectrometers developed ad hoc for this experiment. Of > course - said Gamberale - the ratio 41 is a scientific experiment that does > not have commercial implications. > > Read more: > http://it.ibtimes.com/articles/53211/20130722/fusione-fredda-defkalion-video-streaming-presentazione.htm#ixzz2Zp2uCycD > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Charles Francis <fran...@datacomm.ch>wrote: > >> Shows COP of 5**** >> >> ** ** >> > >
