Jones, f/h, hydrino AND relativistic hydrogen are all the same. I have always supported this hypothesis as the most likely source of the energy if not the primary source [relativistic/ZPE], or at very least the necessary bootstrap to enable the nuclear path theories. As far as the large magnetic fields I wanted to post the temporal chacteristics of relativistic hydrogen compounding the field but think you trumped me by just applying the contracted diameters and inverse square law for field strength. Nicely said! but I don't necessarily agree about the slow buildup of f/h, I suspect f/h forms proportional to loading if the correct geometry is present. You may also need to exceed a hydrogen population/area threshold to achieve the 20% synchronization [metronome platform] before the "agitation" energy [sparks or heater pulses] can actually hard link thru the um scale to the f/h migrating thru the nm scale. IMHO it is these f/h that are able to rectify energy from the changes in casimir value.. recent posts have convinced me this agitation energy requires micron geometry to create plasmons which then upconvert the agitation to local hydrogen that is in lockstep linkage with the f/h in nearby nano geometry. Skipping the normal energy loss with harmonics. Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 4:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Defkalion/MFMP implications for electrolysis? From: DJ Cravens the B field of an orbiting 1s electron about a H nucleus is about 12T at the nucleus. Yes - but since this field is cancelled by the other electron (which completes the orbital shell) in the molecule, it is diamagnetic. But this brings up an important point about a possible role for f/H or fractional hydrogen (Mills hydrino or Rydberg matter are presumably the same). Since the magnetic near-field goes up exponentially as the electron cloud is reduced in diameter we can then explain how such a large external field could be related to a retained population of f/H. It need not be a large mass, given the intensity. One does not need to accept Mills theory for the energy gain but it helps for the magnetic anomaly. The hypothesis goes something like this. When a proton is surrounded by a fractional orbit, that 12 T near-field of normal monatomic hydrogen would increase exponentially; and thus the net amperage-equivalent of the entire reactor would increase when many were aligned - all due to the enhanced field. Since the active material in the DGT Demo had been run many times, we would expect that over time the number of fractional hydrogen atoms builds up. They would be captured internally by the ferromagnetic powder- nickel - between runs and retained. A vacuum could not release them due to the intense self-field, but the net field of the reactor would have a tendency to realign randomly or anti-ferromagnetic on cool-down - so there is no apparent external field until the electron discharge aligns things . If the Defkalion reactor has retained a fractional gram of f/H over many runs - which is strongly bound to nickel nanoparticles, the magnetic anomaly is less of a mystery. In a rough cross-comparison of units in moles and amps- Avogadro and Coulomb are basically a factor of 100,000 apart and we would have the equivalent amperage of 100,000 per gram of f/H - but with possibly much more field strength (amp-turn equivalent) due to increased near-field of each f/H particle. The falsifiability of this hypothesis would be that the reactor does not show a high field on the very first run with new nickel - or even the first few runs. It could possibly take a hundred hours or more to build up a population of f/H. The magnetic field should then increase to an equilibrium point when electrons are passed through the reactor. Jones
