On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:10:26 -0700 blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Presuming (of course) that's actually John Hadjichristos. > > If it isn't, still, well done anonymous troll. > Just to make sure it is seen by readers of this list, here are MY's two replies. I doubt Hadjichristos, if it was really his post, will reply in turn. http://tinyurl.com/lmpej4v maryyugo July 29, 2013 at 12:29 PM I have a better idea, John. Why don't you get Jed Rothwell to provide some independent testing and experts for you? I have contact with him and I will help him make it fool proof. If I play your game, you will just say my qualifications are not adequate. Sorry. No dice. Talk to Jed, though. I know he was willing to go on site to do a proper test of Rossi with appropriate experts and instruments. Maybe he'll do the same for you. Let me know when you have contacted Mr. Rothwell and that you have authorized him to talk to me about the planned tests, schedule and any other particulars. maryyugo July 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM Oh... I meant to mention: the test is not independent unless the people doing the test are allowed to specify how the output power is to be measured and with exactly what method and instruments. If they choose to sparge the output stream, you must allow it. It is also not independent unless your input power source (the mains wiring) is interrupted by the experimenter using their own extension cord and that cord is instrumented with a broad band power meter. And it is not independent unless the origin of ALL wires and tubes connected to the device are fully characterized and understood by the experimenters and enough time is allowed to make sure this characterization is properly performed and recorded. None of this, of course was the case for your demo. Before I even discussed it with Jed, you'd have to agree to all of those conditions. While you're here, maybe you'd care to tell all of us why you did not simply use one your existing reactors which your company claimed to have in dozen quantities since at least mid 2011. That would be the ones with built in high temperature oil, all liquid, flow calorimetry. I'd also like to know how you can feel comfortable in testing a nuclear fusion device, with limited experience, with guests present, without any radiation monitoring and without any meltdown or explosion protection for the observers. Finally, maybe you can clear up the issue of the supposed 1.6 Tesla magnetic field allegedly present at 20 cm from the device. If this is accurate, how do you stop anything in the room which is ferromagnetic and not solidly held down, from rushing to it? Thanks in advance for your time and answers to all these questions.