How about Quantum Decoherence as the energy source? As I am staring at gravity and seismic waves generated from Hurricanes that is what I am seeing in the atmosphere and the Earth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_decoherence Conversion of quantum information into classical. Decoherence occurs when a system interacts with its environment in a thermodynamically irreversible<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreversibility> way Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The thermalization of nuclear energy release is conditional. Proton-21 > produces gammas up to 10 MeV but that process also uses vortex current to > disrupt the nucleus. > > > > Bose Einstein condensation (BEC) thermalizes gamma level energy through a > coherent and entangled superatom mechanism. > > > > > > I do not agree with Dr. Kim that BEC is the primary LENR mechanism. It is > instead a epiphenomenon (plural - epiphenomena) or a secondary phenomenon > that occurs alongside or in parallel to a primary phenomenon. > > > > An epiphenomenon can be an effect of primary phenomena, but cannot affect > a primary phenomenon. > > > > > > In the field of complex systems, the term epiphenomenon tends to be used > interchangeably with "emergent effect". > > > > > > In the E-cat, the polariton formation process allows for the formation of > EMF solutions (vortex current) as separate unconnected units at low > temperatures. > > > > > > > > As the temperature rises, polariton formation of global polariton > Bose-Einstein condensation appears as an epiphenomenon. This BEC will > thermalize the gamma radiation via a superatom mechanism. > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:01 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What is the reaction resulting from this disruption of nuclear processes? >> Does this reaction release energy slowly enough to overcome Roberson's >> critique of the nanomagnetic-scale hypothesis of particle-size as being >> subject to melting by even a single fusion event? >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> *In its simplest expression, what the Ni/H reactor does is convert >>> heat to a special form of magnetism that disrupts nuclear processes. * >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> *The magnetic nature of nickel would interfere with the production of >>>> nano-vortex anapole fields.* >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> *The ability of nickel to affect nano-magnetism must be removed by >>>> getting nickel above the Curie temperature.* >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> *Dipole oscillations are the powerhouse that feeds energy into vortex >>>> current production. The stronger the Dipole oscillations become, the >>>> stronger that the vortex currents will become.* >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> *Through the application of heat, the nickel micro particles power the >>>> LENR process through stimulating Dipole oscillations. This heat >>>> energy is transferred to the dipoles most efficiently at or above the Debye >>>> temperature.* >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> *Also, 137C is the blackbody resonant frequency for micro-particles at >>>> about 6 microns. * >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> * * >>>> >>>> *I bet when Defkalion and Rossi add the nanowire covering to the 5 >>>> micron nickel micro-powder, the size of those processed particles will be >>>> ideal for a 137C blackbody resonance.* >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:28 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does that favor the Debye temperature or Curie point view of the NAE? >>>>> >>>>> Given your prior posting of this video: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqFc4wriBvE >>>>> >>>>> It would seem to point to the Debye temperature. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> *At the heart of the Nanoplasmonic theory of LENR, hot spots produce >>>>>> nano-sized magnetic vortexes that disrupt nuclear structure.* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:29 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To put things into perspective, the Curie point and not the Debye >>>>>>>> temperature of nickel seems to be the most important parameter for >>>>>>>> gain in >>>>>>>> Ni-H. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK, so now we have: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nickel nanomagnetic scale (sub 10nm) particles heated at least to >>>>>>> Ni's Debye temperature, if not its Curie point, and infused with >>>>>>> hydrogen >>>>>>> -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the hydrogen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Areas of clarification needed: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Should "hydrogen" read "protium (ie: Hydrogen-1)"? >>>>>>> - Should there be some characteristic of the ionizing energy >>>>>>> specified so that the "infused" "hydrogen" is properly ionized? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:20 AM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery >>>>>>>> <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Erratum: Debay -> Debye >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, James Bowery >>>>>>>>> <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nickel nanoparticles heated to Ni's Debay temperature and infused >>>>>>>>>> with hydrogen -- the mixture being triggered to a NAE by ionizing the >>>>>>>>>> hydrogen. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Areas of clarification needed:... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - Is there a technical name that can be given to the geometry >>>>>>>>>> of the "nanoparticles" that would, for example, tell us where in >>>>>>>>>> the "nano" >>>>>>>>>> range the size of these particles should sit? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Nanomagnetic scale" (sub 10nm) is a term that may qualify. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> See pages 14-16 of: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://ecatsite.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/energy-localization-no8-11_n3.pdf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
