People keep saying "EMF" in the context of talking about a magnetic field. Aside from the difference being generally crucial, the energy in a magnetic field is unavailable if it is unchanging.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:36 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you are talking to me, a singularity is where I was a year ago as I > have listened to your range of theories. > > You also appear to be embracing string theory now and dismissed it a year > ago. I suggest you stop what you are doing and go back and read up on M > theory while we are throwing out suggestions > > But I will read up on nanoplasmonics. > > Thanks, > > Stewart > > > > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2013, Axil Axil wrote: > >> As Jed has suggested up-thread, you should suspend all current theory >> making until you understand better what EMF brings to the LENR table. I >> also suggest that you study Nanoplasmonics as a modern day extension of the >> pioneering work of Pons and Fleischman. This field is currently the >> enthusiastically embraced darling of traditional science which can start >> your preparation for a new paradigm of LENR theory making. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 13, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> Dfkalion also reports high RF interference with the phone systems and >> their SCADA function. >> >> >> Yes, which indicates that their claim for a 1.6 T magnetic field resulted >> from a misreading of the Gauss meter, perhaps because the meter was >> influenced by an RF field, not a magnetic field. Perhaps the effect gives >> off RF radiation, but it clearly does not create a strong magnetic field. >> Before you provide an explanation, you need to know EXACTLY what happened. >> We do not yet have this information. The information is second hand and >> hearsay provided by people who have shown very little understanding of what >> they have observed in the past. We NEED better data to believe an >> observation that conflicts with the basic ways magnetic fields are >> generated. >> >> Ed >> >> >> The real data reported in the ICCF-18 paper is not hard to interpret.. >> 1.6 tesla at 20 Cms. What could be clearer than that, unless you just don't >> want to believe it, that is. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >> >> But exactly what is the anomaly? DGT reports a magnetic field with 1.6 T. >> Rossi reports RF radiation. Neither source gives any actual data. I would >> not be surprised to see RF radiation. I would be surprised to see a 1.6 T >> magnetic field. The devil is in the details. Using a collection of >> ambiguous data to support a novel theory is not progress. Conventional >> scientists complain that we in the field will believe anything, no matter >> how impossible or poorly demonstrated. You are proving them right. >> >> Ed >> >> On Aug 13, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> Rossi mentioned extreme EMF behavior coming out of his reactor. Two like >> systems reporting the same type of EMF anomaly looks like the real thing to >> me. >> >> If you are really interest in zeroing in on the causation of LENR, the >> also research Rossi's EMF claims. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 13, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> The strength of the magnetic field is a “smoking gun” for soliton >> production. >> >> >> It is a smoking gun if the claim is real. But what if the claim is not >> real? What if we discover it is actually based on an error. What will you >> say then? How much evidence, Axil, do you require to believe an amazing >> claim? You are explaining an amazing claim using an amazing explanation >> with neither having any evidence for being real. Can you see why your claim >> is not believed? >> >> Ed >> >> What remains to be determined is what exact nature of the EMF produced by >> the soliton. And is this EMF responsible for the disintegration of the >> nucleus. >> >> >> Kim thinks it is the electrostatic field. I think it is the anapole >> magnetic radiation that comes out of the solit >> >>
