On Aug 19, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Ed,
I hope my ideas will eventually help you to improve our
theory- this works in case I am really in multiple fatal error.
The future will show, it is nothing personal and i am not angry
because you have told that I am not able to understand your
concept of NAE.
Peter, I find that people have a hard time understanding this concept
for reasons I can not understand. I get frustrated when someone thinks
they understand and publishes conclusions based on what actually is a
misunderstanding. Somehow, I have to get their attention and encourage
them to read more carefully, I hope I have encouraged you to do this.
What has made me to worry was that you have repeatedly
said that NSE is a very simple concept
It is a simple concept. It says that the nuclear reactions can ONLY
occur in special regions within the material. The nature of the
special region is not defined by the word NAE. The nature has to be
defined by the theory using the concept. My theory defines the NAE as
a crack of a special size. Other people might choose a different kind
of NAE. However, I do not understand why you reject the idea of a
crack being important. The crack only provides a region in the
material in which a complex nuclear process can occur without being
influenced by the rules that apply to the chemical lattice.
Ed
I think and I hope NAE is NOT cracks fpr the reasons shown
in the essay. Summa summarum, cracks have no future
and NAE has to be a smart concept, complex.
Best wishes,
Peter
-
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Edmund Storms
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Aug 19, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Ed,
Thank you for criticizing my paper as I have asked the readers.
I am reading everything you are publishing; then perhaps the
problem is my limited or absent understanding.
I hope you are perfectly understanding what you write and will
be able to show at the target where and what I am telling that is
not correct, scientific, is misleading.
I have written first about CF happening in active sites starting
in 1991.
Anyway please make your critic constructive by telling us if the
NAE are cracks or not, if not, then what is their structure and
function.
Dear Peter,
The NAE in my theory are cracks of a especially small gap size that
are generated by stress relief in the material. They permit
formation of a structure that is able to lower the Coulomb barrier
and dissipate the energy by emission of low energy photons from the
nucleus. The theory shows how helium, tritium and deuterium are made
by the fusion process, what conditions are required for the process
to work, and identifies engineering variables that are needed to
control the process. Many details are descried in the papers I have
already sent to CMNS and more will be provided in my ICCF-18 paper.
I suggest you study these papers before jumping to any conclusions.
In addition, If you need more clarification, please ask.
Ed
Thank you in advance in the name of my readers,
Peter
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Edmund Storms
<[email protected]> wrote:
Peter, why do you write about subjects that you know nothing about?
You obviously have not read or understood what I propose. You have
not asked questions or discussed this with me. You make statements
that have no relationship to what I have proposed or even to
general knowledge about the subject. Please, if you want to be a
spokesman for the field, at least learn something about the subject
you are discussing.
Indeed, I find your approach to be very common in this field.
People reach conclusions about cold fusion without any knowledge of
what is known about the subject or even what is accepted in
conventional science. I can understand why conventional scientists
think the people who believe CF is real are deluded. If I had not
studied what is known and seen the effect myself, I would be one of
them. Several people have remarked to me just how low the
standards are in this field. We need to do better.
Ed
On Aug 19, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Friends,
Please read, criticize, and improve the ideas published here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/some-reasons-why-lenr-nae-cannot-be.html
Believe me, I am sincere and serious here, and it is not a case of
crackophobia.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "CMNS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cmns.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
