Waterspouts are not swirling wind and water vapor http://epsppd.epfl.ch/London/pdf/P4_062.pdf
They are strings of decaying vacuum energy On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:42 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jones, > > I agree with your last statement, I do not necessarily differentiate > between dark energy and dark matter, I think it is all primarily vacuum > energy curled up into at least six extra dimensions of space within our > 3-dimensions of space. I think the cores of most all of these > "gravitational" bodies are black branes, including comet nuclei. I > consider this some of the missing "dark matter" that is encased within a > baryonic crust from decay. You can pack a hell of alot of mass/energy > into a volume with x^6 additional volume space to store it. I believe the > core of the Earth may be a six dimensional brain (like a torroid) see > http://cronodon.com/Atomic/String_Theory.html and our magnetic fields are > strings(1-branes) of vacuum energy looping around the poles and making up > her tail. Hurricanes, waterspouts, mesovortex tornadoes and our jet > streams, etc. are all created by these decaying strings interacting with > our atmosphere and earthen matter. The Moore tornado released between 8 > and 600 times the energy of the Hiroshima bomb within 40 minutes and I do > not believe there is any way in hell air and water vapor alone can do that. > The destruction was a release of entropy within those overhead strings > through quantum decoherence. > > These branes are all decaying at their surface and create a firewall of > LENR reactions and decaying to protons (h+) and they "leak" energetic > branes of vacuum energy into the space around them. M theory predicts 11 > dimensions of space (one is time that I see as really decay, but that is > for another discussion) and explains gravity as possibly caused by a > multi-dimensional brane (such as possibly the core of the Sun) "leaking" > branes into other dimensions of space (our 3 - within the solar wind). In > other words, the Earth is orbiting the Sun and "pulls a vacuum" on it and > is rewarded with energetic vacuum particles that decay space and inflate > into strings and form our weather disturbances as they decay in our > atmosphere. And we humans are really just "baryonic crust dwellers" living > on a brane. :) > > We are living each day of our lives through the same process that > theoretical physics predicts the universe started from in my model. Our > lives unfold from the Sun and our weather is really our decaying quantum > gravity field and many clouds are "topological defects" and density > differences. "Branes bring Rain" as they decay and ionize our atmosphere. > > I think Einstein was only partially correct, space is not smoothly warping > around gravitational bodies, the space is full of these energetic, massive > vacuum branes accelerating, inflating and decaying between bodies. Which > explains why the universe is not teeming with life because gravity is > really created by energetic vacuum decaying space between branes and we > walk a fine balance with the anthropic principal. This decaying vacuum > energy gradually ionizes and decays us humans over 80 years or so, some > sooner. > > Last weird thing and I will let you go. My model shows that vacuum energy > just caused the Green Bay, WI bridge to buckle through ionization and > accelerated decay... > http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/09/27/the-reaper-is-hiding-in-the-fog/ > > Fog has killed before and now I think I know why...IT IS OUR DECAYING > QUANTUM VACUUM field > http://io9.com/5955311/the-london-fog-that-killed-over-ten-thousand-people > > Until further notice please walk around sinkholes and stay out of the fog > :) > > Stewart > darkmattersalot.com > > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> There was almost no doubt that Stewart would jump onto this topic with >> a smile on his face – and there appears to be a pretty convincing >> cross-connection between sunspots and planetary tidal forces (not just >> Jupiter but others as well) locked into some kind of a cosmic slow dance, >> as he mentions on his site. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> And the dark-matter input also sounds logical, due to the gammas. Yet the >> calculation of the intensity of tidal forces, as felt by the sun is >> miniscule – almost nothing, at least on paper as far as the gravitational >> component.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thus - the problem is that these two phenomena taken together implies an >> extreme amplification factor or similar reactive connection between dark >> matter and gravity – intense focusing, as if small variation in gravity >> would magnify dark matter by a very large ratio. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> How does that happen? That part does not seem to follow from the >> suspected properties of dark matter… and gravitational “lensing” requires >> galaxy-level mass, millions of solar mass, not a few puny planets. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Yet all of this does seem to fit into a hypothesis about gravitational >> polarization of the quantum vacuum which is by nature catalytic in the same >> way that a small magnet will align a large piece of iron.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> http://phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html**** >> >> ** ** >> >> … but, catch-22, and you may have noticed that if dark matter does not >> “really” exist but the phenomena attributed to dark matter are more easily >> explained by the gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum, then we >> simply call this effect “dark energy” instead J**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* ChemE Stewart **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Agreed, physicists are just a little slow...**** >> >> ** ** >> >> http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/05/04/caught-in-the-quantum-crossfire/*** >> * >> >> ** ** >> >> Terry Blanton wrote:**** >> >> https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/f61d3edfee30**** >> >> ** ** >> > >
