A 6-month test is getting into Underwriters Laboratory territory.  As Rossi
says: "different purposes"


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> A 6-month test is ridiculous. It does not prove anything that a 1-month
> test would not prove. A week would probably suffice.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to