Just a question to people who watched the controversy, especially with lewis.
Beaudette says that there was only 4 critics, all rebutted, especially lewis critics which was just of his incompetence in calorimetry, added to huge ego and lack of ethic. being attorney of the devil, do you confirm that position really? is there any solid critic on some calorimetry that is still open? was there at least one that survived some time ? that appeared recently (CCS for example - is it closed) what is shocking me is that i see no serious critics reported by skeptics, and for example the Pomp&Eriksson critics agains Levi&al/Enforsk/E-cat, was really pathetic for professional scientists... I'm shocked to see that official critics ignore many cross checking done, and ignore even the error value they claim, compared to the observation. On Levi&al even critics on blog were better informed and more realist than this pretended Wikipedia-stamped paper. Beaudette says that no critics was really published, or else was quickly rebutted? It seems skeptics pretend to be "rigorous" but they looks less strict on reasoning and evidences than some conspiracy theory fans. amazing. I'm just trying to find opposite vision, because it looks so weird. if confirmed this is more generally a question on how science can call in delusion and groupthink, incompetent, dishonest, anti-scientific, loose and unaware of it. 2014/1/16 Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> > Not really because I would be rich, old, and living in an academic bubble > where I would be shielded from accountability by other like-minded ladder > climbers. Also, most people in the United States of Amnesia don't even > remember who the hell I am; they just remember the residual superficial > mythology that Cold Fusion is "pathological science". That's why its on > those of us who are aware to constantly point out the jack-assery of > two-faced opportunists like Lewis. > > Regards, > John > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:12 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Wouldn't you be getting nervous about now if you were Nathan Lewis? >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Wow the producers of BigThink are really scraping the bottom of the >>> barrel. I remember him being much more articulate and less nervous looking. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:19 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Erratum: He said "hundred" not "thousand". I guess the 900 he left >>>> off were cold fusion. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:15 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=55KoDmTxaUI#t=1176 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
