Does anyone have published evidence that LENR either is influenced by
or creates a magnetic field? DGT claims that a magnetic field is made
but provides no evidence. Letts finds that a magnetic field changes
power production, but many reasons can be found for this effect in his
device. I acknowledge that some people have theories that predict
magnetic effects, but are these effects real?
Ed Storms
On Jan 30, 2014, at 12:12 AM, David Roberson wrote:
Let me speculate about the magnetic field. My suspicion is that the
magnetic field encourages the LENR activity. The additional LENR
activity somehow interacts with the magnetic field to increase the
strength of that same field. Thus you have a positive feedback
mechanism in effect that ensures that both the magnetic field and
LENR activity are significant.
I don't know how these fields interact, but the coupling might well
be the reason that LENR is difficult to observe. If the coupling is
too light, then nothing of significance occurs because the positive
feedback loop gain is less than unity. If the loop gain is greater
than unity, then you find the device exhibits good performance.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wed, Jan 29, 2014 10:58 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR monopoles.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
How do you reconcile the existence of the high powered magnetic
spots in the operating DGT reactor? Why was there a direct
correlation between the magnetic output of that reactor with its
heat output?
What was the source of those magnetic spots in a 700C plasma after
the spark discharge?
Riddle me this Eric.
Assuming we have a basic understanding of the scope and
applicability of DGT's claims about magnetic transients (which I
don't), I would assume they arise due to something other than
quasiparticles. For example, there could be current transients.
Why not start with the simplest explanation first instead of
reaching for the fancy stuff?
Eric
