-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Fletcher 

> The following is a selection of credible strategic shocks....


Here is another one which is more a twist on a known risk. And it could involve 
LENR but not in the way most are anticipating.

The most credible and imminent future shock for the USA is probably the 
Yellowstone caldera. Some experts think it is ripe for a supervolcano and the 
one early potential date is 2023, not too far off. This date comes from the 
periodic earthquake swarms which follow peak solar activity by 3-4 years.

This is no ordinary volcano. It could wipe out most of the population in a few 
years. Plus, it could in fact be powered by a giant "natural" nuclear reactor 
like the one at Oklo in Africa, but deeper, wetter and possibly augmented by 
LENR.

Far more helium is coming to the surface in the geyser gas than could ever be 
expected. 60 tons per year is measured and it could be 100 tons or more. A 
hundred pounds of helium from fusion represents about 30 terawatt-hours of 
thermal output, so this amount of heat in Yellowstone is unimaginable from a 
nuclear source, unless that helium has been stored for millions of years, which 
is what the experts "want to believe".

The amount of helium is way too much for nuclear decay, in my view, and the 
2500 earthquakes per year make it unlikely that helium could be naturally 
stored there for a decade, much less millions of years. Therefore it seems more 
likely that this helium could indicate the presence of a natural reactor which 
is picking up steam, so to speak.

http://www.ibtimes.com/helium-yellowstone-national-park-way-more-ancient-element-escaping-expected-1556898

There is also the chance that some of the helium is coming from hybrid LENR. 
Uranium hydride is a subject that has been kept under that table for years, but 
fission/fusion could be a cofactor in UH reactions.

Dufour, J et al "Hydrogen triggered exothermic reaction in uranium metal". 
Phys. Lett. A, 2000.270: p. 254

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DufourJhydrogentr.pdf

Given that the French are not as restricted in pursuit of this kind of 
comparatively "dirty" energy option as we are in the USA, one is led to wonder 
if they have pursued the hybrid technology privately in a Programme Noir? 

It should surprise no one if they have, since there is lots of depleted U to 
deal with from their huge reactor network, and what better way to use it?




Reply via email to