Hello Jones,
At the Dutch university I have seen 100% reproducible excess heat effects
with solidfuel mixtures, specified by Mills.
Further they studied the plasma cell experiment which was first successfully
reproduced by Prof Conrads
a renown plasmphysicist. They couldnt find an ordinary explanation for the
effect. There was an excess heat effect
of 0.5W/cm3 plasma
The problem with all these systems is that they have or a low energy density
or they produce the energy in a burst.
The claim of the 50kW prototype is easily reproduced but to regenerate the
solid fuel mixtures is the key problem.
This is not something unique. I mean it is always very difficult to make a
working device that can be used day by day without
interuption.
The system which Mills has developed rrecently generates an extreme high
powerdensity plasma, which could in principle be
transformed in electricity (by MHD) and heat. But ofcourse there are
difficult challanges to overcome before there is
a continous working system which can be used 24/7.
Peter
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:41 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: The "Bettery," EEStor and the f/H battery
-----Original Message-----
From: pjvannoor...@caiway.nl
I wrote a 10 W CIHT cell has been developed by Mills. Not a 10kW system.
The
system is scalable to higher power levels.
Sorry to misquote you, Peter.
Of course you are aware that On May 28 2008 (through about 20 National press
releases) BLP announced to great fanfare that they have been testing a 50 kW
prototype which was ready for production (6 years ago) - and that several
major licensees would soon be producing power to the grid. So, it is
understandable why anyone might wonder why 10 watts is even worth mentioning
today?
What happened to that 50 kW prototype? What happened to that gigawatt of
licensed power? Have you never questioned Mills on that? That really bothers
me and it should bother you.
Well, what happened was the same thing that happened to the Capstone Turbine
project 6 years earlier, and a handful of other hollow promises over the
years.
Nothing from BLP in the last two decades has been substantially more than
vaporware, including CIHT - and essentially anyone who believes that a real
product will be coming out of Cranberry soon, without real 3rd party
verification - should question their sanity. Anyone who invests money with
Mills should do likewise - at least until one single energy anomaly is
replicated. Replication by a backslap from Gen3 - whose head is also a BLP
Director is a joke.
It only takes one proved anomaly to silence skeptics, and Mills has not met
that low burden of proof - although admittedly, he probably has a few that
he cannot show - probably because they become radioactive over time.
Jones
