Eric--
You wrote:
> I have the general notion of two nucleons combining to create a larger
> nucleon with less mass and a release of energy. The branches would need to be
> different.<
I have had a similar notion relative to the Pd-D system. Specifically two D
come together to form a virtual excited He particle with high spin energy that
fractionates its high spin energy to electrons and other coupled particles to
attain the desired low energy associated with the stable He particle. Only
many low energy photons are involved. to balance the lower mass of the He
compared to the starting material.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper"
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
No, it’s not opinion when 100% of the available proof is on your side.
That's a pretty strong assessment of the merits of your position. :)
It is fact that LENR is not and cannot be a known fusion reaction, since it
is fact that no known nuclear fusion reaction is gamma free. QED. ... By
definition, cold fusion cannot be the same known reaction as deuterium fusion
to helium, which was known prior to 1989 - if it is gammaless – unless and
until it can be shown that there is a real physical mechanism for not only for
suppressing gammas, but for suppressing 100% of them without exception.
Does either of these statements contradict anything I've said or assumed? I
hope my outlining of my assumptions demonstrates that I do not have the typical
fusion branches in mind. I have the general notion of two nucleons combining
to create a larger nucleon with less mass and a release of energy. The
branches would need to be different.
Eric
