Of these cells, how many of them were in a mode where the heat production
was unequivocal in the sense that a casual observer would be hard pressed
to deny what was going on?

Good examples of this in history are the:

1) original "hole in the lab table" event that triggered F&P to pursue the
phenomenon in earnest

2) the original "heat after death" event that boiled away the D2O without
any energy input?


On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Then it is easy to see how someone like JT He who reviewed the evidence
> could come up with 14000 replications.
>
> Let's say that, using Ed's figure of 1060 reports, that an average of 14
> cells were successful for each experiment.  That would get you the 14000
> figure very quickly.  And I've seen   indications that some of these guys
> were getting more than a hundred cells to work.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I see it all over the place that "hundreds of times" it's been
>>> successfully replicated.   Here, Storms says: "During the 20 years since
>>> the original claim, hundreds of successful replications have been
>>> published."  He then goes on to look at 386 of them.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://fusiontorch.com/uploads/StormsJudgingValidityOfFleischmannPonsEffect2009.pdf
>>>
>>
>>
>> Let me point out that this is 386 reports, or laboratories reporting.
>> There are many more individual experimental runs than this.
>>
>> This paper references Storms' book, and the tables in it. It has a list,
>> "Reported successful FPE experiments" which begins:
>>
>> "Excess Heat, Table 2, pages 53-61, Number of Successes 184
>> Tritium Production Table 6, pages 79-81, Number of Successes 61
>> . . ."
>>
>> In the book, the first thing listed in Table 2 is:
>>
>> "Dardik et al. DW Iso. open electrolytic Pd, LiOD+, D2O, 1.8"
>>
>> Dardik has done hundreds of positive experiments by now. So have some of
>> the other groups in the list of 184 positive excess heat experiments.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to