There is a temperature sensitive chemical reaction component to all this. A chemical hydride reacts to temperature to increase or decrease the release and absorption of gaseous hydrogen from the solid form which modifies hydrogen pressure.
To regulate temperature stability, the hydrogen pressure should go up when the temperature goes up. Too much hydrogen pressure must slow the reaction. Hydrogen pressure is another temperature controlling parameter. But when the reactor cools completely, all hydrogen should return to the solid state. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Axil-- > > It seems clear that the NAE in a good, long term energy producer must be a > dynamic system with feed back to automatically control reaction rates. > Much like in a fission reactor where the population of neutrons increases > or decreases inversely with temperature thereby controlling fissions and > heat without large internal temperature variations. > > For the formation of BEC of Cooper pairs temperature AND magnetic field > are probably pertinent parameters. The same is probably true for proton > pairs. In addition the frequency and polarization of oscillating magnetic > fields may be important. The geometry of the NAE is also likely to effect > the production of paring, however, controlling the geometry may not be in > the cards. You take what you get or engineer a stable fixed design. Rossi > probably has done this engineering of the geometry of the NAE in his > system. As we have conjectured in the past, 1 or 2 dimensional structures > are probably better to encourage pairing and NAE. > > I doubt the computer automation would be fast enough to control the stable > production of NAE. I think it must be an inherent feed back mechanism for > adequate control with steady temperatures. As we have discussed in the > past, local changes of the magnetic field may be the controlling parameter. > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:54 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Resonant photons for CNT ring current > > Most LENR researchers use static NAE in their systems. Examples of > static NAE are those cracks produced hydrogen loading. > > When NAE hot spots are produced through a dynamic mechanism as they are > required to keep the reaction going. NAE destruction does not kill the > reaction over time. In a dynamic NAE system, NAE creation exactly matches > NAE destruction. > > In more advanced systems capable of producing NAEs as an ongoing process, > computer automation control can signal when NAEs are reduced in numbers > below reaction specification and a activation of a plasma based dust > production process rebuilds the NAE population. > > Think of NAE's as lumps of coal fed into a coal fire by a temperature > controlled stoker. Lowering temperatures cause a thermostatic process to > fed more coal lumps into the coal fire. > > Such a dynamic NAE system can run for years without degradation in > performance. > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> It strikes me that as so many LENR researchers tried to scale up their >> results, they have failed. That would seem to suggest that higher >> temperatures kill the LENR effect, which favors BEC formation theories. >> \\\ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Jones: >>> Using your later input, how about the 1DLEC, pronounced OneDellECK. >>> >>> 1 Dimensional Luttinger Electron Condensate >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> >>>> *From:* Kevin O'Malley >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What I call the Vibrating 1Dimensional Luttinger Liquid Bose-Einstein >>>> Condensate , the V1DLLBEC. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We gotta think up a better name, especially if it will include solids. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
