IF the energy came only from deuterium nuclear breakup (D = 2(H)) , the energy level seen would be reduced by a factor of 6000 along with the expansion in the gas volume.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Carl High <diamondweb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps a dumb question, but would there be enough deuterium in natural > hydrogen to carry the reaction forward? > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:34 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: > >> The main problem I see with this line of reasoning is that Rossi and DGT >> are getting positive results. Why would that happen unless the normal >> hydrogen reacts with nickel directly? There may well be a reaction of D >> taking place within the system, and if singular hydrogen is the result, >> then that should start reacting by itself generating heat. There remain >> too many questions and it is prudent to consider that this experiment needs >> to be replicated before the total story unfolds. >> >> I would much rather see normal hydrogen reacting with nickel as the main >> energy source for several good reasons. Rossi and DGT appear to have >> strong positive results and of course the cost of D is far in excess to >> that of 1H. Let's allow the dust to settle a bit. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Fri, Mar 28, 2014 11:06 am >> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Mizuno slides coming >> >> *From:* Eric Walker >> >> I would have thought that the protons would migrate out and recombine >> to form H2. But I don't think that would account for a twofold increase. >> >> There would be a net decrease in gas quantity under any scenario in which >> D2 reacts with nickel - never wound an increase be expected, even small - >> much less a ~2:1 increase in gas quantity. Amazing. >> >> The chances of measurement error are minimal with this kind of >> instrumentation, especially since they performed a control run which did as >> expected - so the best assumption is that what they reported was at least >> fairly accurate. >> >> This takes a while to sink in, but it most likely means essentially that >> almost every deuterium atom is converted into 2 hydrogen atoms, with a net >> gain in energy. This also means that very few deuterons could have reacted >> with nickel, or else the quantity of gas would not have increased so >> remarkably. >> >> That is our most likely starting premise, unless there was severe >> measurement error. If there was measurement error in this aspect - then the >> calorimetry is also highly suspect, since it is much harder to perform. >> However, the control run indicates that they did everything correctly and >> we should at least start our analysis with that premise. >> >> Jones >> > >
