It struck me that if quarks exist within the confines of a volume for
hadrons--protons, neutrons etc.--then why not other virtual particles within
a linear space? The Dirac sea seems to fit this definition of a linear
"space" also with virtual particles--like a linear "particle". Even the
skeptics should be able to accept Dirac's idea. It may even have a bigger
variety of virtual particles for potential reactions over and above that
offered by a neutron and protons in hot fusion.
The force fields--gravity, electrostatic, magnetic--may tend to "line up"
the linear Dirac sea along a preferred angular momentum, spin, direction and
hence facilitate the reaction of the Dirac sea with real particles, also
aligned with the preferred direction. The statistics of such interactions
would be good to know.
Intense fields may also squeeze the Dirac sea to a smaller dimension and
hence make the momentum of its virtual particles greater, consistent with
the uncertainty principle. A knowledge of the spectrum of energy and
momentum of the particles coming out of the sea would allow further
understanding the relation of external field strength to the effective size
of the Dirac sea via the Uncertainty Principle.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jones Beene" <jone...@pacbell.net>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 7:28 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent hydrogen
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook
… the size of the Z point or line [1D interface] must be pretty
small, between the proton size and the Heisenberg dimension of about 10^-35
cm. It may be that the wave of the proton is such that it can "fit inside"
the dimension of the single line of the Dirac sea and become a virtual
charge, combine with an electron and hence pop out of the constrained sea
(line) as an H with lots of extra energy.
------------------
That is an intuitive way to look at the detail of how this extra dimensional
modality could happen with protons.
With a deuteron instead of a proton, and especially with the Mizuno
experiment, the same M.O. seems to be not quite as elegant at first glance -
but obviously, having both an electron and a positron transfer into 3-space
from the Dirac sea provides a way to have two protons appear in place of one
deuteron - and retain conservation of charge at the same time with more net
energy.
Unlike most observers of LENR, I'm of the firm opinion that there can exist
several if not many modalities for gain happening at the same time in any
experiment - of which the Dirac sea modality is but one. It seems to work
better for hydrogen than for deuterium, on paper- however, the more one
thinks about "the sea" in the context of Mizuno - the better the whole
hypothesis sounds. There are so few satisfactory ways to explain what looks
like deuterium fission, that this one could be the best.
It would be very helpful to know that Mizuno's result (of deuterium
splitting into two protons) was repeatable by another group - and to know
exactly how much radiation is seen. I am assuming that some radiation is
seen but that it is highly disproportional to the thermal output.
If radiation (or transmutation) is not highly disproportional, then there
could be several routes to gain in the Mizuno experiment.
