What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of his results? Seriously, the protocol that is reliably reproducible has been the Holy Grain of cold fusion research from day one. I find it stretches credulity to the breaking point that after this statement in 2003:
*Has anyone replicated this effect yet? * Yes, it's been replicated now by three or four different labs Replication didn't spread like wildfire. On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seem like no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and > it usually revolves around making money. > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That was a 2003 interview. >> >> If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science >> fair in the world by now. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml >>> >>> >>> >>> Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up >>> to 30 with it. >>> >>> >>> >>> He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium >>> which has been roughened through deuterium loading. >>> >>> >>> >>> Here too, the level of magnetic production by SPP generation is >>> amazingly very low powered yet can produce a high COP. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
