Maybe, why not? These days we can film while watching the final image. Besides, he says there were 2 pictures known. So, we also could also consider that he did not see while not watching with his eyes first. As for the physicist, it seems that while not reproducing exactly, it was good enough. There must be something missing, but it is a small correction, by comparing the simulation and the picture.
2014-04-29 17:57 GMT-03:00 ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>: > Are you saying the camera lense created the phenom and that the > photographer did not see it with his own eyes first? > > The physicist is even saying he cannot recreate the scene with his optical > halo program using flattened pyramidal crystals > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> And also aligned with the photographer... >> >> >> 2014-04-29 17:31 GMT-03:00 ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>: >> >> Right, it is not an arc, it is a cusp of vacuum energy, gravitationally >>> aligned with our solar brane. >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This is probably due the camera, an not the sky, due the V shape, which >>>> is not an arc, which is usually as seen on sky. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>> danieldi...@gmail.com >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> danieldi...@gmail.com >> > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
