From: Eric Walker H Veeder wrote:
Proessor Roger Bowley unlocks his car from various distances, using waves from his key, brain and a big bottle of water. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Uqf71muwWc Nice. Professor Bowley: "The only way to find [about something] out is to do the dammed experiment. Disprove your prejudices." Nice, but it’s not the whole story. What is even more fascinating is that which is overlooked - in the context of RF which is near the brain (and into the GHz range) – with those waves being able to scramble the H20 of the human brain in order to amplify the wave, exactly as shown here. Doh! It’s the cell phone, professor. And it’s all about the resonance of RF inside of cavities of the proper dimensions. This type of cavity resonance may make the subject relevant to LENR. One can disprove prejudices and at the same time be in complete denial about the dangers of a beloved addiction. That is another type of (reverse) prejudice. Or one can quote from a study funded by the cell-phone industry, since many of them are, which say the cancer link is unproven. This is reminiscent of smoking studies which for years could not agree, until the studies’ funded by tobacco companies (often indirectly) were discredited. The signal from a cell phone is many times more intense, the frequency is higher so the photons are more dangerous, and the wavelength is perfect for reaching resonance inside the brain cavity of a human … yet dozens of studies are in conflict over the issue of cancer causation. Follow the buck … or better yet … do the experiment. The World Health Organization declared cellphone radiation as carcinogenic in May 2011. It was the experimental evidence that was important to them. As Professor Bowley sez: "The only way to find out is to do the dammed experiment!” Lab studies were done on neural cells at WHO which showed the rapid rate at which double strand DNA breaks upon exposure to RF at levels regularly experienced by cell phone uses. Few deny that broken DNA leads to cancer … eventually. It is simply a matter of time. Nevertheless in the USA, a “capitalist’s tool” (or fool) at Forbes ignores the most damning studies in favor of the ones showing little correlation, even when common sense suggests otherwise… and the argument drags on. Billions are at stake. Why do you think most cell phones come with a warning (ignored by all) not to hold the phone closer than one inch to the ear? Simple, the lawyers put that warning into the implied contract so that they can later use it against the plaintiff when the case comes to court in 20 years, over brain cancer… kinda like the health warning on cigarettes. There are still many MDs who will state, under oath, that smoking does not cause lung cancer. Here’s the really sad thing. There is a valid solution: Bluetooth (or a wired equivalent). This kind of thing should be mandated, especially for teenagers - so as to limit the radiation intensity - but it is not. It reduces radiation by 800 times ! Why isn’t this mandated? http://bgr.com/2011/06/09/jabra-recommends-bluetooth-headsets-in-lieu-of-brain-tumors/ Yes, it is a self-serving story in a way. Nevertheless, with any solution someone new will benefit and someone else will lose. Even if radiation reduction is only 100 times less, instead of 800, this makes perfect sense. “Do the dammed experiment!”
