Rossi's reactor reaches a burn up temperature of 2000C before the refectory outer shell of the reactor melts down. Please explain how this very high white hot temperature can be reached if the heat from LENR is generated from inside the nickel powder.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Yes. Perhaps you should come up to speed before going into @$$#0/e mode. > > > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Any references available? >> >> >> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> You're the one falling for your own bs. You can look at a volcano and >>> call it an impact crater. And it's not only this set of data that points >>> to an under-surface phenomenon. Hagelstein in his recent IAP lectures said >>> that there is not evidence to support the contention that it's a surface >>> phenomenon. You're the one who's lagging in understanding on this issue, >>> no matter how often "I instruct you". >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I remember this picture of the volcano. It was found and misrepresented >>>> in the Brillouin energy theory document >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.academia.edu/4206209/Brillouin_Energy_Corp._THE_QUANTUM_REACTION_HYPOTHESIS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This photo is based on a piece of core from one of Roger Stringham’s >>>> sono-fusion devices. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You are failing for this propaganda that Brillouin energy is using to >>>> support their theory. This is BS. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The crater was created by a cavitation bubble which projects a plasma >>>> jet that penetrates the surface of the metal to excavate a pit into the >>>> metal as seen in the picture you reference.. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, the mechanism of cavitation is different from SPP in Ni/H because >>>> the SPP is produced on the walls of the collapsing cavitation bubble >>>> exterior to the metal and projected onto the nearest surface of metal that >>>> is adjacent to the bubble. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> As often as I instruct your, you never learn. This stubbornness is a >>>> problem that will keep you from true understanding. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Right here, Axil: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg91559.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me experimental >>>>>> results that contradict this fact. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Jed Rothwell >>>>>> <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's for deuterium! No one knows what happens with H! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, I suppose it produces some other gas, probably deuterium. But >>>>>>> the point I was trying to make is that only half of the helium emerges. >>>>>>> The >>>>>>> rest is trapped. So there is no process going on that quickly and >>>>>>> forcefully empties out the lattice and replaces all the gas in it. I do >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> think it is likely that the deuterium is be forced out and replaced, but >>>>>>> the helium remains trapped. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Jed >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
