Personally, I think that is why our "cold fronts" in nature, which release the most energy during storms, are really just expansion/inflation of the vacuum and can create a hell of a lot of water as oxygen is ionized and combines with hydrogen.
600 x Hiroshima bomb released in 30 minutes from the Moore, OK tornado I believe this is the Final phase of inflation from our quantum vacuum gravity field and why the Earth is 75% water Stewart On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > In nature, the "coldest" nucleus could be defined as the most > energy-depleted. Which is the same way of saying - highest binding energy > per nucleon. The dividing line, or the interface, between positive energy > and negative energy will be cold, relative to its surroundings. > > Nickel-62 is the coldest nucleus in nature - an isotope having 28 protons > and 34 neutrons - with the highest binding energy per nucleon (8.8 MeV). > > It is often stated (wrongly) that iron-56 is the "most stable nucleus", but > actually 56Fe only has the lowest mass per nucleon (not binding energy per > nucleon). This misconception probably originated from astrophysics, since > those guys pay less attention to the little picture than to the big > picture. > > OKAY - so what? > > Did I mention that the dividing line between positive energy and negative > energy will probably be cold; and consequently a good choice for gateway > into an energy "sink" will likewise be very cold relative to surroundings. > This gives two prime choices, and one of them, nickel, has proton affinity > - > which the other lacks ... and in fact iron becomes embrittled on proton > exposure whereas nickel absorbs. > > Jones > >
