The man difference: HTSC was discovered too early in the good place.; CF was discovered also too early but in the worst place wet electrochemical system- where it is inherently unmanageable irreproducible and can not grow up. A scientific tragedy. Peter
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > the difference is that it needed no instrument to be observed > (levitation), and that physicist have replicated it, and not only chemist... > > The tragedy of LENr is that is chemistry experiment, indirectly measured > through invisible characteristic needing confidence in instruments and > computation (balance), and that physicist thinks it is their business > because it is nuclear. > > since they say it is not nuclear, they should let the chemist decide. > > most chemist decided that their funding and career did not deserve to be > ruined for that and they kept silent (because they were not enough > incompetent and crook to support the deliria of > taubes/Huizenga/Parks/Lewis/hansen/Morrison and their parrots)... except > few irrational=honest chemist ruined their career ands lost their funding. > > > 2014-06-15 6:45 GMT+02:00 Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>: > > And yet, there is still no established HTSC theory. Using the reasoning >> that has been applied to LENR... therefore, HTSC must not exist. >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> http://www.superconductors.org/News.htm >>> >>> I am please to be the first to post that Superconductors.ORG reports >>> high Tc has been advanced to 77 Celsius (170F, 350K) >>> >> >> > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
