Easy enough to take 2 salt water aquariums, fill both with sea stars etc...

Expose one to a water softening device, and the other as the control.

Second test, take some hard water and measure it's hardness somehow? And
then expose to Radar.

Tell Marine Biologists about your discovery.

Should be easier than proving the effects on humans/mammals.



On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:46 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/06/17/the-clue-is-in-the-goo/
>
> I think I figured out all of these Governmental Pulsed Microwave/RF radars
> are just Water Softeners on Steroids
>
> Sent from a plane going 500 MPH somewhere over the Gulf of Mexico
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:51 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> June 21st is my birfday, I will be 50, which kinda sucks because I still
>> act 18.  I will make the claim in advance that the Earth is not really
>> round, it is a 6-D vacuum torus with a glob of baryonic decay around it
>> that we play in.
>>
>> Stewart
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, June 18, 2014, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>>>                 From: Bob Cook
>>>
>>>                 I am not so sure that Rossi is completely wrong…. If the
>>> first step is to create heavy electrons that facilitate the reaction of a
>>> proton with a Ni nucleus, Rossi may be correct.
>>>
>>> Bob,
>>>
>>> Normally we expect that the inventor understands his device, but you are
>>> aware of the problems with that view - has anything changed?
>>>
>>> There is no known nuclear reaction of nickel which produces only stable
>>> isotopes as ash, and no reaction with a proton to go to copper which
>>> matches
>>> the facts- which are no gammas and no radioactive isotopes, and with no
>>> disproportion of isotopes compared to natural ratios.
>>>
>>> The Swedes already did isotope analysis of the copper in the ash (which
>>> is
>>> definitely there at about 10%) and found the isotope ratio was completely
>>> natural, with no radioactivity and no indication of transmutation. They
>>> concluded that the copper (and iron) was there initially. They found no
>>> light elements.
>>>
>>> Of course, one can invent another miracle, besides the first miracle of
>>> nuclear fusion, and assert that not only does proton-addition happen,
>>> but it
>>> is a new kind of fusion reaction, previously unknown to physics which
>>> creates only stable isotopes; but then the third miracle is the isotope
>>> ratio, which must remain completely natural. That is three miracles
>>> required.
>>>
>>> Many of Rossi’s supporters will not rule out nickel to copper, despite
>>> “conservation of miracles”, since the inventor believes it to be true
>>> and he
>>> should be given benefit of doubt. FWIW - my view is that Rossi does not
>>> understand his own invention, nor do the top experts like Ed Storms. It
>>> simply cannot involve transmutation of nickel to copper or the fusion of
>>> protons to deuterium (which will eventually produce tritium, which is
>>> absent). The Swedes ran it for 6 months, and they will have lots of
>>> tritium
>>> to show us - if this is what Ed Storms believes it to be.
>>>
>>> But after 6 months if there is no substantial tritium then there is no
>>> hydrogen fusion at all, and we must look for other explanations.
>>>
>>> I am still optimistic for a Saturday release of the report. It is the
>>> midsummer holiday in Sweden and June 21 was the date in 1633 when Galileo
>>> was forced by the Inquisition to abjure his Copernican views… a fitting
>>> day
>>> for any pariah to confront the mainstream stance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to