Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. *There are many who have been paid to demonize LENR and to hinder any > progress*. Just look at some of the material uncovered by the famous or > infamous Edward Snowden. > This is speculation. Unless someone discovers proof that someone, somewhere, was paid to demonize LENR, we will not know this for a fact. Just people have been paid to demonize other subjects, that is not proof they are paid to attack cold fusion. Frankly, so many people attack it without being paid, I doubt anyone would bother to hire people for this purpose.
> Another example of paid entities working to suppress the truth and push > forward the false, evil, and greed-inspired agenders of their paymasters, > is the Global Warming group > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy>. > That is a well documented example. If we find similar documents for cold fusion, we can then claim it has been similarly attacked. > Allegations of free energy suppression are not a new thing. > Allegations are not proof. > 2. *Mega rich oil barons* won’t allow cold fusion to destroy their > multi-trillion dollar oil industry. > I doubt they are aware of cold fusion. I know they fight against wind energy and energy efficiency. If they knew about cold fusion, I suppose they would fight it. It is possible they are fighting it, but I do not know of any proof of that. 3. *Most scientists renounce it just because higher scientists have done > so.* > This is true. > 4. *Patent applications.* Not only does the patent office have a well > known secret of rejecting anything to do with cold fusion, but some patent > applications also deserve the treatment they get. > The Patent Office policy is not exactly a secret. And yes, many patents should be rejected. > 6. *Mankind has not fully tapped into it.* The science behind it is not > really understood yet. > True. As far as I can tell, it is not understood at all. - Jed
