I was not aware of Poher, but given that shouldn't Morton be considered a further and earlier verification of this effect?
Sure it might be harder to directly replicate his results, but the same force from an asymmetrical spark discharge was noted. It might also be worth noting Piggot: http://www.rexresearch.com/piggott/piggott.htm On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > There is an intriguing cross-connection between two other controversial > lines of anti-gravity experiment: Eugene Podkletnov (mentioned in the Wired > article) and Claude Poher (not mentioned). Here is a review of Poher’s > superconductor. > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1101/1101.2419.pdf > > NASA has reportedly confirmed an effect of reactionless acceleration with > Poher’s device, but nothing turns up to verify that, on a quick google > search. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Poher > > Here is a technology that can unite all three phenomena… > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_radio_frequency > > > From: Alain Sepeda > > this is the 3rd test, done with different metrology, and > with many cross checking documented on EmDrive (like changing turn...)…he > have good hint, no more... about the theory the idea that the EmDrive is > surfing, rowing, sculling on the virtual particles of the void is the most > reasonable I've heard. > > David Roberson: > > I have a hangup about the conservation of momentum that > makes me skeptical of this device. My guess is that the thrust will be > shown to be an error once everything is taken into account. The power to > generate the large amount of RF must enter the device from somewhere and > that is likely the root of the thrust. > > Eric Walker wrote: > > > > http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-spa > ce-drive > > > >
