Bob, I am asking these questions in an attempt to determine the quantum step energy levels associated with spin coupling. Of course there may be a limiting frequency above which the same coupling no longer applies and that would negate my attempt to stretch the effect. If the quantum steps at UV and low X-Ray frequencies were as small as those apparently seen at RF, then I could justify my thoughts about magnetic spin coupling for LENR energy release.
Would one consider it possible for the spin resonate frequency to be scaled up directly as the local magnetic field increases? If true, then some of the ideas being floated around about extreme magnetic fields associated with nano sized resonators might offer a solution. Is LENR the big brother of MRI? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sun, Aug 3, 2014 3:08 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Important finding for nanomagnetism LENR Dave-- Regarding questions about hydrogen nucleus tuning--I would say that the H in a strong magnetic field increases its spin energy in steps separated by multiples of spin quanta. I do not know if the increase in energy results in a mass increase or not--it may. The tuning is seen in the decreased wave length of the H wave function. An oscillating magnetic field can cause the H to jump to a energy state associated with the frequency of the magnetic field. I think the field oscillations, if only modulated around an average field strength, can also tune the H to absorb energy in quanta associated with the magnitude of the field. In a solid state the coupling between various spinners and the direction and magnitude of the field complicates the dynamics. I think the data was basically experimentally determined and that good analytical formula were not generally possible for any given system to specify frequencies or energy quanta. Things may have changed since the early 60’s when I was involved. NMR is a pretty refined field now with finely tuned equipment . The general theory my be different. My working feel for magnetic resonance is old. Bob Sent from Windows Mail From: David Roberson Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 11:17 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Bob, you seem to have a good working knowledge of MRI devices so I have a few questions for you. Does the emission frequency of the hydrogen nucleus become tuned by the level of the external super magnetic field? How much tuning is seen during normal operation and in research? The reason I ask is that it is obvious that the energy levels would be very close together if they can be detected by variation in the RF frequencies emitted. Then one would ask how far upwards in frequency(energy quanta) does this effect translate? And finally, would you expect the spin coupling of this nature to exist at the much higher energy levels that are seen in LENR devices? It is not clear to me yet, perhaps due to some hang up, how far apart the various energy levels due to spin states are in nuclei. What would determine how close together each step would be to its neighbors? Is this a measurement determined quantity or calculated by a really good formula? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Fri, Aug 1, 2014 2:35 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Important finding for nanomagnetism LENR Jones and Axil-- As You may guess, I tend to agree with your considerations regarding spin coupling and magnetic resonances. The intense fields at small dimensions allowed by the nano size structures is an inference that I have long held. Keep up the good discovery work. I wonder if any of the Professors at the University of Strasbourg are in the group trying to determine the theory of Rossi’s TPT? I’m heading to the University of Bologna in 6 weeks and hope to talk with the folks there about their ideas. I will report back asap. Bob Cook Sent from Windows Mail From: Axil Axil Sent: Friday, August 1, 2014 8:21 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com If a magnetic force is produced by an atomic levelcause whose dimensions are nanoscale, and the intensity of the magnetic force at20 cm is 1 tesla. By the cube law relationship, the intensity of the magneticsource as produced on the nanoscale can be reckoned as 2*10^^8 cubed or somethinglike 8*10^^24 tesla. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: http://phys.org/news/2014-07-tiny-magnets-huge-fields-nanoscale.html#nwlt Doudin et al - at University of Strasbourg propose that nano ferromagnetic electrodes can create powerful localized force fields which are tuned by an external magnetic field. "Localized field" is a key. Inverse square power laws can make a large difference. Their finding can be understood as similar to a precondition for nanomagnetism in LENR. Of course, this paper is ostensibly not related to LENR, so it would also be a mistake to try to read too much into it. One must first understand the nuances of superparamagnetism, as the gateway to spin-coupling in LENR... then this cross-connection can become apparent. The authors construct nanonickel electrodes in a solution containing paramagnetic molecules and control the electrode's magnetization direction with an external magnetic field. In so doing, they created a conductive molecular-sized switching system which is the chemical equivalent of a spintronics spin valve. Spin coupling is implied. In LENR this molecular level switching would occur at Terahertz blackbody rate of the thermal system, and would act as a pump for extracting spin energy from protons, nickel atoms, or both (as magnons) - which show up as thermal gain in a system where superparamagnetism and superferromagnetism compete with each other. "Magnon" is another key concept for LENR. The high level of spin coupling to magnons is possible as a direct result of competition between superparamagnetic and superferromagnetic particles in motion, and in phase change - as well as a dynamical Casimir effect at the same geometry. Moving from a geometry defined by micron dimensions to nano, when magnetism is involved, brings with it the potential for gains of 1000^2. That, in a nutshell, is what nanomagnetism is all about. Jones And ... for the benefit of the growing "spin-coupling" "nanomagnetism" cadre on vortex, consider inverse cube as it relates to the Biot-Savart Law for magnetism. The parameters for change from square to cube favor the smaller dimensions. The Biot-Savart Law has a cubic power law denominator and ostensibly gives an inverse cube dependence for magnetism in those scenarios. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biot%E2%80%93Savart_law
