On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right, Kevin! The definition of SWOT is clearly given in the first > paragraph > of the paper- have you read it? > ***Nope. I stopped short at undefined acronyms and the risk of downloading the latest virus. > In management SWOT is a standard procedure a must. > ***Yup. standard procedure, and typical nonsense associated with as-yet undefined acronyms. > Each field of knowledge has its specific jargon, including abbreviations, > acronyms. > ***And yet, you're running into those who don't know your supposed jargon, so you have no business using it. > English is poly-semantic, the words have many meanings > ***But Jargons and Acronyms are Mono-Symantic:BJAAAMS. GAC. GWTP. > > BTW, there are fine acronym- finders on the web. > ***And the few I tried did not decode your acronyms. Look how far down in this discussion we have gone without you defining your ridiculous acronym. Why should I read your paper? > > I have studied web-search for many years, from the old days when it was > based on knowing the best sources and the fastest algorithms up to today > when it's just the art of getting rid of the nasty intruding ads. > ***Nice to know. And yet, after all that bullshit, you still didn't define your acronym. WSL? GWTP? FYATHYRIO. > NALOPKT, > Peter.. > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> There once was a reason for acronyms: lack of memory and time and >> space. But your computer has plenty of memory, it takes only a couple of >> seconds to push out the definition of SWOT, and there's plenty of space. >> WTFPA? WNJPOTOWRTTFA? TANSTAAFL. GWTP. WSL? W<UNLMA???? >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Dear friends, >>> >>> I have just published; >>> >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/an-uptodated-swot-analysis-of-e-cat-for.html >>> >>> It is mainly about T of SWOT; many of the readers (me included) will not >>> like everything I say here. >>> But reality will accept it, how is possible to respect ALL the good >>> rules in a very VUCA situation? >>> Can you educate your children without fairy tales? >>> >>> Inventors have to think realistically, act pragmatically and communicate >>> diplomatically. Let's try to understand what does this mean in this case.. >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
