Good point Dan – and “relativistic” hydrogen was embraced by Mills in 05 in paper by Jan Naudts.. even the EM drive claims a relativistic theory. IMHO the chase is finally leading in the right direction. Fran
From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 9:31 PM To: John Milstone Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:NASA Telescope Observes Signal That Can’t Be Explained By Known Physics All reasoning is wrong, except for the last equation, which is correct, by coincidence. The last case is the case for the relativistic electron, without spin (so, it's not really an electron). This equation is ignored in all text books, but the solution is OK, in quantum mechanics. You don't need all the crap Mills invented. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
