Dear Thornros, Thank you- till now only you due to your technology- management-leadership have contributed with an addition to the Probletence in LENR paper. You already have launched interesting and useful ideas about use of ab broad inter-disciplinar approach in LENR development - and I found inspiration in this.
As regarding your present addition- I am sorry to subtract a bit of it. Dura lex, sed lex- the law is hard but it is law and we must iobey it. the first rule - a powerful majority is against the search of a solution, all wqe can do is to surprise them with one obtained in spite of their negative attitude. For this we need skills, stubborness, and luck. If crazyness helps- is a problem of definition. Let's hope Rossi DGT and other 3-5 companies will create valid and viable LENR (or what will be its name then) technologies. Just an aside< Randy Mills is playing in an other league- he is not, will not be considered CF/LENR. To defeat law No. 2 we have to change thinking mentality, abandon guruship and fanship and find new realistic ideas.(these appear to be crazy at the start- you are right) The same is true- in action for rule no.3. Peter On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote: > Hello Peter, > I think your analysis are absolute spot on. Although as I want things to > be positive rather than negative I was searching for a way to express > myself in a way that the same meaning appeared. Well, I did not succeed > very well. However, in that search it struck me that there is one factor > that can eradicate all the negative things your three rules reveal as > mortal. It requires someone a little bit crazy, with a passion and an > interest in reaching the solution. Why do I say crazy, because that is how > you circumvent rule 1. You just don't give a rip about what others think or > what is ,'ettikette' or how the establish think thing should > happen..Obvious total immersion, focus comes from passion so that breaks > rule 2. Because this person is somewhat crazy he will not pay any attention > to how it must be. He just test and eliminate ways to reach the solution. > > We all know that my statement is true in regards to all the stories about > great inventors. Is it true about LENR. I think it is. I have never met the > drivers of the two companies driving what I understand currently being the > best possibilities for a commercial product. Andrea Rossi and Dr. Randy > Mills are the names mentioned in that position. I have no clue about which > theory is better. I do know that AR has much less need to show exactly why > and how but that it provides result, while the opposite is true about the > Dr. Mills. No, I did not say that AR is crazy, but he has had a colorful > life and showed that authorities being, government or competition does not > stand in his way. Personally I like that form of 'craziness' and believe > that gives the ecat a better position to reach the commercialization (=the > GOAL) first. On the other side I have to say that the Dr. has shown a great > deal of ingenuity over long time to have people sponsor his theories. In > today's very bureaucratic investment climate, which requires that you act > and perform following the rules.. (Everything is built on computer models > and real knowledge or gut feelings plays very little role in the decision.) > That would of course make your rule 1 obsolete and say the opposite - > "that you need to follow all rules better than others and you will get so > much money that you can afford to do so many experiment that you finally > will just find the proverbial needle in the haystack. > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com > lenn...@thornros.com > +1 916 436 1899 > 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 > > “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a > commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear Friends, >> >> I have just published: >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/lenr-wants-to-grow-up.html >> >> a new paper in the series-"why technology first?" >> >> it is about prediction and history but it will not make history; if you >> read it, you will easily realize why- it tries to break 3 potent, cruel >> laws. >> >> Technologically yours, >> Peter >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
