True, and that energy finds itself being radiated into open space. Dave
-----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 6:39 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism Circular motion produces acceleration and requires energy to maintain. On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:36 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: At any point in space a net vector exists for both the static electric field and steady magnetic field. This is the vector set that can be balanced out fairly easily. Changing fields such as those due to electromagnetic waves are a different subject. This is off the subject somewhat since I was referring to an ideal environment with my original comment. The crux of what I was saying is that it takes an accelerated charge to generate radiation. That acceleration can readily be due to an external electric field or a magnetic field that is directed properly. Dave -----Original Message----- From: mixent <mix...@bigpond.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Aug 19, 2014 5:44 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:11:51 -0400 (EDT): Hi, [snip] > >And, it is possible to create an opposite field to balance out that natural >one that is measured within a small location in space. This is done with pairs of coils, etc. > >Dave There isn't just a single natural field. You should read Puthoff et al. According to them the ZPF comprises the superposition of all the fields of all the particles in the Universe. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
