When a Rossi reactor melts down, the reactor goes to 2000C and when the hydrogen explodes, it send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal and plasma in all directions and for a long distance.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, statistical control is a reasonably strong approach. I take > ethernet as an example. > > 10/100 Mbit ethernet was once dominated by National Semiconductor, heavily > relying on their analog background to control tightly the parameters > involved. They were overtaken by a disruptive technology using DSP and > statistical "control". It turned out that it made the analog simpler, and > the digital side of the issue meant that die shrinking took place much > faster. By the time National spent $120M buying Comcore to play catchup, > their die size was 60% larger than Broadcom. The next generation was > gigabit ethernet, where the vast majority of the game was with DSP and > Marvell entered the picture. As each generation of ethernet came out, it > was more digital, more millions of transistors doing DSP where analog used > to be, and eventually it was so cheap that we now buy those chips for $2 at > 1Gig/s when they were originally $45 at 0.1Gig/s > > By using a statistical approach, Rossi puts himself on the digital scaling > roadmap rather than the analog scaling roadmap. It has tremendous merits. > > What is the danger? If an air conditioner goes on during August when it > ain't hot, what's the harm? If Rossi's device goes kaflooiee in the first > generation, it will just stop working. By the time the 3rd generation > rolls out, it will no longer go kaflooiee, and it will be under far tighter > control than if he had taken the "analog" route. > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Statistical control is like saying that most of the time it is hot in >> august so turn on the air conditioners in august. Most of the time you are >> correct, but sometimes a bad thing happens. >> >> >
