Rossi should know well whether or not his device works and I suspect that his
continuous pointing out that the results could be positive or negative is based
upon his desire to appear neutral toward the scientific measurements. Of
course there is always the chance that those performing the tests are not able
to obtain completely unambiguous results.
The device might not be producing the level of COP that we would like to see
delivered which again could leave the testers confused. I suppose that we will
just have to remain patient until the report is produced.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wed, Aug 20, 2014 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers
Alain,
It doesn't sound like good news to me. I don't see how they can
disagree much about the experimental results.
I didn't think they were supposed to pontificate about how it (LENR)
worked. If they do, of course there will be disagreement.
The story was they were provided with three samples and only used
one for the whole test. If it didn't work, or even didn't work well, one
would think they would try another of the samples.
I also can't figure Rossi keeping on about how he doesn't know if
the results will be negative. Surely, if anyone knows, he must.
