Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: At 09:13 AM 10/11/2014, Axil Axil wrote: > > We give Rossi too much credit in our assessment of his control and >> understanding of his reactor. He is just feeling his way along like the >> rest of us. >> > > I'm sure that by now he can do mass spectrometry of his ashes any time he > wants . . .
Yes, I expect he has a lot more data to work with than we do. > I still think it might be a selection artifact. The team selected a few > milligrams of the powder, and then the analyzer selected ONE particle of > the ash. There's probably a range of efficiencies in the particles as a > whole. That sounds plausible. I wish they had looked at more particles. Apparently IH prevented them from doing this. That's what Lewan said. > This particular one might have been hyper-active and burned up all its Ni. > Others might not have "ignited" at all. > Assuming the Storms NAE theory is correct, I think it is likely. - Jed
