Hi all, again I try to prepare arguments for deniers. Precision is not my problem...
The problem with the e-cat test, as McKubre said is tha the calibration was not at 1250C/1400C but at 450C now if you are sincerely skeptic, and not totally conspiracy theorist, you have to admit that the powermeter are right, and that the IR cam have only a potential problem with emissivity tables (not transparency). assuming the reactor is a COP1 load. assuming the dummy was a different component (magic oil to change it's emissivity and electric behavior) consider the first phase of the test at 800W as a calibration of a COP1 reactor. what can you conclude of the +100W increase of power creating +200K of apparent temperature integrating magic convection (bigger or smaller as long as possible), changing emissivity that is realist, what can you conclude ? naively removing convection I interpret the +12% of power as causing 3% increase of temperature in kelvin, about 45K, and not the 150K observed how can this excusion exist with a COP1 ? is it possible ? what should be the emissivity change? convection change ?
