Of course Darden's statement is what it is supposed to be. I am sure he is constantly trying to handle his golden goose. That is a rather taxing job I am sure. Like always the patent problem is huge. There is no protection in any patent if you have not:: 1. Enough capital and time (manpower) to defend and persuade your unique rights. 2. Your patent covers every thinkable angel and prevent that someone can circumvent the patent. When reading the comments on Vortex I find that way too much energy is spent on to criticize the test and to ind out, what is going to happen on the commercialization of LENR. The Pomps of this world can work on the doubts. I am sure that is not a problem for either Darden or Rossi. I am also convinced that Darden has enough information that he is not willing to terminate his efforts to bring e-cat to market.I hope his assessment is right. I even believe so. I am fine with a very low COP. I think engineering will take it to where it needs to be. Time is uncertain.In this forum we often compare to the Wright brothers and the lack of acceptance. I believe people was saying similar things. "Yes, it works for 75 meters and perhaps it was down wind so they were actually sailing". If I had the funds and the knowledge I would not hesitate to take all the information available and make soem random but informed guesses how to improve the little we know. Age is another factor - yes!:) To me Bleriot was more famous for his flying than Wilbur Wright. Such an opportunity. I hope it holds water all the way.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote: > goal of a patent is not only to prevent others to copy your technology, > but mostly to prevent competitors to use your own technology. > > patent don't work very well, but their main effect is that some patent > troll can block real innovators. > this is why people like amazon patent thinks like photo of goods on white > background... just to prevent a troll to do it. > > note also that it was observed that weakly patenting your product is a > good tactic to push competitors to copy you, while protecting your IP is > found to push them to innovate... > Farewell, the soviet spy who killed USSR spying industry reported that > USSR was so industrially pumping western IP that the scientist and > engineers were furious and discouraged. > they had very good scientists, motivated, and who develope very innovative > solutions, because of their different situation... but their solutions were > ignored, prefered to copying the west. > > anyway, give a price to 10% of planet GDP and imagine how rich can be > Darden... and imagine that the difference will be what others people will > gaine... it is not even a tip to the guy who took the risk. > > if you want to make entrepreneur be sure not to benefit from their risk > taken, be sure you will have people whose dream is to be a bureaucrat in > DoE. > See how our mentality evolved in France... given what we did in the past > in science, entrepreneurship... > > the system of incentive make the mentality of the population. > kill the reward, you kill the risk taking. > > What Darden says, is totally synchronous with LENR-Cities founder > position... > there is not enough mouth to eat the cake of LENr revolution, so who cares > who bite the first... their belly will be full. > > > 2014-10-20 15:09 GMT+02:00 Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>: > >> >> http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/techflash/2014/10/raleigh-investor-darden-still-bullish-on.html?page=all >> >> I was re-reading this, and I strongly agree with one of the comments. >> >> "“I don’t care who gets there first, how it happens,” he says. “I just >> want to see it happen.”" >> >> The statement is either a total misquote or a complete lie, and therefore >> undermines the credibility of Tom Darden in a huge way. >> >> >> If that statement were true, than Darden would take his chances with the >> US patent office and open up the IP for replication. >> > >
