An odd thought occurs to me, taking Jones guidance of no nuclear and the remaining portion of your statement [snip] how the SPP concentrate EMF and project it ….. with the help of particle formation from the vacuum.[/snip] I ponder a resonant system across spatial scales where one side of the circuit [capacitor] is the SPP while the opposite side [inductor] is lock step motion of hydrogen atoms sawing through lattice defects with plasma acting as the hard linkage between. The geometry forces quantum action of the gas in lock step which is then harnessed by the SPP in what amounts to a self assembled Heisenberg trap / oscillator, powering an oscillator with not so random motion of gas. Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 8:34 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:A new type of laser is born? From: Axil Ø Please...yes, you are all on the right track,,,This is all standard nanoplasmonic theory. What is not covered by you good fellows yet and the area that I am still ahead on is how the SPP concentrate EMF and project it to cause nuclear reactions with the help of particle formation from the vacuum. Please. There is no evidence of nuclear reaction in this experiment. There is no gamma, no bremsstrahlung, no radioactive debris, and the ash show unequivocal evidence of pure isotope having been added - to make it appear nuclear. There are prior legitamate experiments from Piantelli with Ni-H which are nuclear, but in those cases, he clearly shows an extremely wide range of transmutation products. This experiment is not related.
