Jones, John,
John [snip] Heat is a chaotic form of random microscopic changes
in kinetic energy, if so there should be windows where there is no change in
momentum which could be argued to be as localized moments of zero heat?[/snip]
Jones [snip] This possibility would also suggest that a Casimir cavity is or
acts 'as if' it were a two dimensional space. There are a number of papers on
this second prerequisite, many of them by Calloni, but I will save that for
another time. The argument is sound.[/snip]
Yes, syntax like temperature and momentum will forever confuse this field until
we accept Lorentzian scale negative acceleration – as Jan Naudts uses it to
explain the hydrino as relativistic hydrogen..this is not your grandfathers
hydrogen escaping the sun at large fractions of C but instead normal velocity
hydrogen caught in the gravity hill between Casimir plates. It changes inertial
frames not by spatial velocity relative to normal space but rather normal
velocity thru fractional space.. the quantum effects of the plate geometry the
hydrogen is passing between modifies space in a negative way. Instead of
compressing more vp into an inertial frame by rushing thru the ether like a
rainstorm the hydrogen turns and shrinks to fit between the plates and from our
perspective is hit with less vp while from it’s local perspective there is time
dilation such that it thinks it is still being hit with the same number of vp..
IMHO issues with M&M experiment, the Italian reserchers DiFiore et all [trying
to stack cavitys for gravity mod] and measurements of time dilation “ACROSS” a
Casimir cavity are all wrapped around this same axle. We know that photons turn
into phonons once they get below their own wavelength passing thru an aperature
so I don’t think this method should be used to test for time dilation. My gut
still tells me that catalytic action is based on this change in geometry and
that what we perceive as catalytic action may be different inertial frames
where the reaction speeds are a function of the changes in dilation rate.. like
little spaceships in an asteroid field being slingshot around and about by
gravitational pulls only these are gravitational hills following an inverse
cube law of geometry separation distances in constant opposition to the square
law isotropy as the Casimir force value fluctuates. This remains my pet theory
for the basis of a self assembled HUP trap/demon that pits 2 forces of nature
against itself [isotropy vs DCE] and it remains for us to orchestrate the feed
such that these opposing forces can generate heat.
Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 9:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Can the wave function of an
electron be divided and trapped?
From: John Berry
Also, if you seek a transient effect, does heat exist in a moment?
Heat is a chaotic form of random microscopic changes in kinetic energy, if so
there should be windows where there is no change in momentum which could be
argued to be as localized moments of zero heat?
John, That is an interesting thought from several perspectives. We could call
it a “localized freeze” or simply “subradiance,” which is well-known under that
name. Even though we do not normally think of semi-coherency as being related
to “lack of” a parameter, there is no reason we cannot phrase it that way.
First – whenever there is superradiance in a larger system, there is
corresponding subradiance – for a net energy balance of zero, if no outside
energy enters the system. Secondly, this goes back to the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam
problem, first written up at Los Alamos 1955, which seeks to explain how
seemingly chaotic systems often express regularly ordered periods (such as hot
and cold bifurcations). In effect subradiance powers superradiance. Finally, a
“localized moment of zero heat” is more likely in the situation where there is
a bifurcation between superradiance and subradiance at extremely small
dimensions, such as a nanometer sized cavity… and especially where there are
gaps in the emission spectra due to Casimir dynamics.
Jones Beene wrote:
An interesting possibility about FQHE – in the context of LENR, is that there
could be a transient version inside a Casimir cavity.
The phenomenon of the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE) occurs when
electrons are contained in two dimensions, cooled to near absolute zero
temperature, and exposed to a strong magnetic field.
On the surface, it would seem that this cannot happen in LENR as a static
phenomenon, as the temperature is way too high… but electrons confined inside a
dielectric Casimir cavity, which is inside a metal matrix - even at 500C could
experience a transient version of FQHE in a situation where SPP are supplying
the strong magnetic field, and virtual photon exclusion by the cavity walls
provides the cooling effect, and the inside of a Casimir cavity can be modeled
as 2-D.
The first and last are found in prior scientific studies, but the cooling
effect is not seen in the literature, AFAIK.
Not sure what direction you are going with this – but in 2010 – we were talking
about fractional electron charge (AKA: FQHE) as being the driving force behind
one form of LENR – at least the non-nuclear version of LENR and possibly the
Mills’ version - which happens at the nanoscale or in Casimir cavities. Several
times since then, the fractional Hall effect has been tied to thermal anomalies.
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg40603.html
“I won't go into all of the lore of monatomic hydrogen, going back to
Langmuir, or the Mills' version of fractional hydrogen called the hydrino -
except to say that there is another possibility that encompasses both of
these phenomena - and it can explain other "hot hydrogen" (HH) phenomena or
anomalies, so long as we limit it to two dimensions.
This possibility would also suggest that a Casimir cavity is or acts 'as if'
it were a two dimensional space. There are a number of papers on this second
prerequisite, many of them by Calloni, but I will save that for another
time. The argument is sound.
According to Laughlin, electrons can form an exotic state with fractional
charge in two dimensions. Unlike the putative hydrino, this seemingly odder
beast is accepted by the mainstream. It has even won a Nobel. Consequently,
taking this bit of insight to the next level - given that all electrons are
happy to form pairs, it is suggested that HH is itself related to FQHE via
paired electrons.”
