Also see: *Shocking! CERN may not have discovered elusive Higgs Boson particle after all*
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/19802/20141108/shocking-cern-may-not-have-discovered-elusive-higgs-boson-particle-after-all.htm *Maybe it wasn't the Higgs particle after all* http://phys.org/news/2014-11-wasnt-higgs-particle.html *Technicolor (physics)* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technicolor_(physics) *Alternatives to the Standard Model Higgs* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatives_to_the_Standard_Model_Higgs On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Talk about Lenr suffering under the weight of many theories, that's > nothing compared to the many dozens of theories that now attempt to explain > where subatomic particles come from and where they get their mass. Yes, we > heard the the Higgs mechanism was the answer after the 60 year effort to > successfully describe how a particle gets its mass. Particle Physics just > does't like the lite weight of the Higgs Boson. The particle guys feel free > to invent dozens of alternative theories that are still competing with the > still top of the heap Higgs theory. These theories are grouped under the > title of “The Technicolor Higgs” theories. These theories purport to > explain how the weak force works as a more fundamental theory than the > Higgs theory now is. The Higgs boson is now a composite particle comprised > of N numbers of Techo-Higgs particles. > > Those physicists are hypocrites when they criticize Lenr for not being > well grounded in a single theory and Lenr has been at it for only 25 years. > The Higgs theory is more than 50 years in the making with no end in sight. > > See: > > The Technicolor Higgs in the light of LHC data > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.2097.pdf >
