Also see:

*Shocking! CERN may not have discovered elusive Higgs Boson particle after
all*

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/19802/20141108/shocking-cern-may-not-have-discovered-elusive-higgs-boson-particle-after-all.htm

*Maybe it wasn't the Higgs particle after all*

http://phys.org/news/2014-11-wasnt-higgs-particle.html

*Technicolor (physics)*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technicolor_(physics)

*Alternatives to the Standard Model Higgs*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatives_to_the_Standard_Model_Higgs

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Talk about Lenr suffering under the weight of many theories, that's
> nothing compared to the many dozens of theories that now attempt to explain
> where subatomic particles come from and where they get their mass. Yes, we
> heard the the Higgs mechanism was the answer after the 60 year effort to
> successfully describe how a particle gets its mass. Particle Physics just
> does't like the lite weight of the Higgs Boson. The particle guys feel free
> to invent dozens of alternative theories that are still competing with the
> still top of the heap Higgs theory. These theories are grouped under the
> title of “The Technicolor Higgs” theories. These theories purport to
> explain how the weak force  works as a more fundamental theory than the
> Higgs theory now is. The Higgs boson is now a composite particle comprised
> of N numbers of Techo-Higgs particles.
>
> Those physicists are hypocrites when they criticize Lenr for not being
> well grounded in a single theory and Lenr has been at it for only 25 years.
> The Higgs theory is more than 50 years in the making with no end in sight.
>
> See:
>
> The Technicolor Higgs in the light of LHC data
>
> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.2097.pdf
>

Reply via email to