On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:57:32AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: > ted, is elm's "save" key really '>'? anyway, you might want to change > these lines to read:
It was in the early 90's... > is another name for your "received box", so a quick >> keystroke is quite nice. > macro index > <save-message> > macro pager > <save-message> > > that way, if you ever bind s to another key (or if someone uses your .muttrc > and binds s to something else), the macro doesn't break. did you try this yet? mutt macros only allowed key to key tranlations (and not key to functions) when I added those. It'd be cool if it works that way now though. > > mbox-hook =linux-kernel.in =linux-kernel > > do you *really* have that much free time on your hands?!? ;-) Yes, with the help of my ctlr-r macro. I can scan subject headings quickly for what's relevant to me. By NO means to I read every email. > 1. use someone else's .muttrc > 2. read the mutt manual when you have time > 3. configure your .muttrc as you learn more Absolutely. That's my general approach to anything new technology wise anyway. Jump in... get swept away... enjoy the ride [1]. [1] I am kidding. But only a little. -- Ted Deppner http://www.psyber.com/~ted/ _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech