i'm trying to decide whether i want junkbuster to manage cookies. the mechanism is by far more configurable than anything i've ever seen. i like the idea of feeding cookies that say "leave me the PHRACK alone" back to the servers that send cookies.
it would be a bit more convenient to do it with opera, however. opera has a pretty advanced cookie system right now with all the features you'd expect like blocking/allowing cookies on a per-site basis. and lots more. i'm trying to decide. does anyone have any wisdom that points to either direction? opera managed cookies or junkbuster managed cookies? i'm curious though -- i took a quick look at the faq and didn't immediately see how to disable cookie cutting. how do you do it? pete begin Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > You know how to tell it not to block cookies? I prefer to let konqueror take > care of that. > > On Friday, December 14 2001 01:12 pm, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: > > begin p <p> > > > > > i just installed junkbuster for the first time. all i can say is... > > > whoa. > > > > > > my only complaint is that browsing seem to be perceptively slower. not > > > enough to stop using junkbuster, but it's a bit noticeable. it's nice > > > that junkbuster seems to read the blockfile dynamically, but i wonder if > > > reading and parsing the file contributes to the lag. this probably is a > > > queue to look into the squid cacher. > > > > i take it back. junkbuster doesn't read the blockfile on the fly. my bad. > > > > pete -- ** Please don't send me html email ** PGP Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D PGP Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech