On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, ME wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Rod Roark wrote: > > Interesting, I never thought about that before. The "locking" > > (and corresponding unlocking) could easily be done by xor'ing > > against some string of pseudo-random characters that only > > the encryptor knows how to produce. > > The most advanced encryption available is found when you use 2XOR > (double-XOR) with your data and the same key. > > You also get a huge cost savings in performance, as some stes can be > skipped and, 8 bit 2XOR is just as secure as 2048bit 2XOR (assuming the > same key in both passes. > > (Tongue in cheek - biteing down hard.) > > (This would have been better posted April, 1,2002 ;-) > > -ME
Ouch... _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
