On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:36:13PM -0700, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> On Mon 14 Jul 03, 4:05 PM, Ted Deppner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > portmap: 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
> > mountd: 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldd /usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd
> [no libwrap]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldd /sbin/portmap
> libwrap.so.0 => /lib/libwrap.so.0 (0x4002a000)
>
> ted, it looks like portmap is linked against wrappers but nfsd isn't.
> at least on my system.
Yup, same here.
Now, look at rpc.mountd, the thing responsible for doing the mounts, aka
mountd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd
libwrap.so.0 => /lib/libwrap.so.0 (0x40022000)
> if it's not linked against libwrap, then it must be explicitly stated in
> in inetd.conf type config file.
>
> at least, that's my understanding...
Yes, that's true.
For the archive, and those less well versed, "explicitly stated in
inetd.conf" would mean a line that contains "/usr/sbin/tcpd" in the
"server program" field of inetd.conf... in other words, it's either linked
against tcpwrappers libwrap, or you've specified tcpd as part of the
invocation command line.
--
Ted Deppner
http://www.deppner.us/
_______________________________________________
vox-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
