On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:59:12PM -0800, Ryan Castellucci wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 05 November 2003 09:24 pm, Ken Bloom wrote: > > Will SpamAssassin's bayenessian be more effective if I train it on > > every message that comes through (even ones that it's built in tests > > have already rejected as spam) or only on false negatives? > > Yes, it's much more effective if you train it on all messages.
Woah. Dumb question, but when did SpamAssassin go Bayesian? It's one of the reasons I switched away from it to Bogofilter. > - -- > PGP/GPG Fingerprint: 3B30 C6BE B1C6 9526 7A90 34E7 11DF 44F3 7217 7BC7 > On pgp.mit.edu, import with `gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 72177BC7` > Also available at http://www.cal.net/~ryan/ryan_at_mother_dot_com.asc > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/qeMwEd9E83IXe8cRAlyeAJ9sbWEc3Xh6FMuOPlV+xN/IIhNe3wCfZ5ED > Vzr1RDtPeiqOyZGlKxnvqIY= > =qpF8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > vox-tech mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech -- R. Douglas Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dooglio.net GPG Fingerprint : FE6A 6A57 2B95 7594 E534 BFEE 45F1 9E5E F30A 8A27 MIT.edu recv-key: C55B91D4 GPG Public key : http://www.dooglio.net/dooglio.asc
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
