Rick Moen wrote:
It's their interpretation of a specific sentence in 17 USC 201 that I find extremely questionable.
My point was that it _is_ the way copyright law is applied, as a result of a couple of hundred years of caselaw. Now, I'm sorry if that differs from what a lot of programmers assumed to be the case, but it's nonetheless true.
Can you cite specific examples? That's kind of what I was complaining that she didn't do. It seems very strongly to go against what the actual text of the law says.
-Micah _______________________________________________ vox-tech mailing list vox-tech@lists.lugod.org http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
