>
> > I would be careful slamming another product in public. People can get
> > sued for things like that.
>
> I would hardly call it 'slamming in public'. It's a simple comment that
> calling something a 'release' when it is quite far from a 'release' (http
> resume not working, graphic printing not working, no internal SSL etc),
> isn't really on. This is a personal view of course.
>
Well, http resume works better here than on V, and this 'no internal SSL'
doesn't make much difference for me as a miami user... I prefer V3 too,
but I must admit that IB is much more stable on my system than V3, has
some very nice things (am I the only one who loves the 'Open new browser'
functionnality ? ), is amazingly fast in table decoding,
and that except window class support missing in JS, no Flash, no CSS/DHTML, and
occasional crashes when using the tabs, I don't have much to complain with it...
Hey V3 is great, is doesn't need to be compared to its concurrency to appear
as a great browser.
Phil.
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
