In a message of 20-Oct-99 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> I find a cachebrowser indispensable. It enables me to find a cached
> page much easier than the About:Cache feature in V3, since I can set
> filters to remove images and such from being displayed. It also
> alphabetizes, so the entire site is all together and not spread out
> over a couple hundred lines (or more).
Well, I have to admit that I never have been able to make the cache
browser work. When I started the cache browser it started scanning
the cache and (probably when it was finished) then it crashed.
Futhermore I have always found the cache browser as well as About:cache
useless since it takes the cache browser or Voyager, respectively, close
to a decade to scan the cache.
> I can selectively erase, move or copy. Many times when I'm through
> reading a site, I like to erase it, just to keep the cache a
> manageable size. (The Maximum Ondisk Cache setting doesn't seem to
> work in V3. It never worked in V2.95 either.)
I have never had any problems with 2.95 with respect to this. Voyager
has just nicely kept the size of the cache at the limit I have set, and
when I recently decided to make the 2.95 cache half its previous size
(because I now use V3) then Voyager 2.95 just nicely removed half the
size of the cache.
My V3 cache hasn't reached its maximum size yet, so I don't know if it
works.
> All things considered, for me anyway, a web browser without a
> cachebrowser is like a car with one wheel missing.
:-)
Uffe Holst
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"