Matt Sealey writes...
> Your mission - Jools, Ian, Mathias - should you choose to accept it, is to
> read this mail, understand that V works just fine, and quit telling me
> that it isn't working fine, and that I require looking at it more than I
> already have to understand something I've known to be the case and
> I have prompted, testcased, overseen, and verified the fixing of already
> this year.
For the record, I have not suggested that anything in the concept of
compatibility to common-use code is inherently wrong. I merely stated
my concern that, since the non-standards are not documented, some care
would be needed to look at the exact behaviour.
You have made it very clear that you believe that sufficient care has
been taken. Well and good, why couldn't you say that in the first
place without all the offensive ranting?
Your mission, though I doubt you'll accept it, is to understand that
users cannot read the minds of the developers, are entitled to hold
opinions different to your own and, if you invite them to comment on
the development, may tell you things you didn't want to know.
Regards,
Ian
===
_____________________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP
Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE
