Hello Uffe!
On 2002-09-05, you wrote: > In a message of 05-Sep-02 J�rgen wrote: > > Offcourse! But this doesn't make an amiga with a 060 slow, does it? I > think > the fealing of a real Amiga is fast and smooth aswell. > When you use the word "slow" you always compare it against something > else. If I compare my 060-based Amiga with my brother's old C64, then my > Amiga is damn fast. But when I compare the speed with which my 060-based > Amiga, e.g., displays JPEG's with the speed with which my friends > Windows-based PC's display JPEG's, then my Amiga is bloody damn slow. Yes I know. Never said anything else. Still, Windows doesn't seem fast even though it's runing on much faster hardware. It should have felt so many times faster then AOS on current Amiga-hardware even on a P200 but it doesn't. And I'm talking about Win 95 now (later versions are even slower (XP)). So yes, you can compare slow with fast in many ways. People can think that AmigaOS and software are fast on their machines no matter if it's possible to run AOS faster on a PC. It's not up to someone to decide what's fast and what's slow. If I think that my Amiga is fast I will think so no matter what. I will not think it's slow just because you tell me that Amithlon is faster. I've tried Amithlon and yes it is faster but I still think that my machine is fast. Ok? Regards /J�rgen _____________________________________________________________________ Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/ Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/ Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE
