On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Jim Thompson <j...@netgate.com> wrote:
> > Either that, or Cisco moves to builds apps the same way. You guys & gals > break the tree for us about twice per month lately. > Hi VPP-ites, That's maybe not such a bad notion. What about taking, say, the entire VAT piece out of VPP proper, and making it a standalone project that is built using an installed RPM/DEB VPP build instead? Sure, it would be a bit of a pain for some developer, but it would also help to crystalize the boundaries between VPP-proper and CLI/API users as well. As it is, there are some fairly serious cross-over issues that are discovered as we stumble through our development as an API-only-user application. (This issue, the CLI directly using some functions instead of an API, is what lead me to introduce a patch for the "set MAC address API", for example.) HTH, jdl
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
